Long Tall Sally近期加入了Feefo，因此其网站会显示由Feefo和之前的提供商收集的点评内容。
显示全部1,494条点评
AT
Anne Tully
经 Feefo 确认
GBR
1 day ago
Anne Tully 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
LTS quality is rubbish.
Charged for return postage.
Izzy
Long Tall Sally
11 hours ago
We’re sorry to hear you were disappointed with the quality and the return postage charge. We appreciate your feedback and will take it on board as we continue to improve our products and service.
0
分享
LM
Lynn Mcarthur
经 Feefo 确认
CAN
1 day ago
Lynn Mcarthur 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
Great jeans!
Arrived on time.
0
分享
KW
Karen Watson
经 Feefo 确认
GBR
1 day ago
Karen Watson 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
Used to love LTS
Very quick delivery just not sure what is going on with the sizing. I used to love LTS.
0
分享
JO
JoH
经 Feefo 确认
1 day ago
JoH 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
Great linen trousers
Great service, fast delivery
0
分享
JO
Joyce
经 Feefo 确认
USA
1 day ago
Joyce 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
I love shopping at LTS.
I've been ordering from LTS for years. And have found a lot of good buys. I'm always ecstatic when what I order fits. That way I don't have to return them and pay that $22.00 return fee. But that's...
阅读更多
0
分享
受信赖的顾客
经 Feefo 确认
2 days ago
Sizing is off for US purchasers and return shipping expensive
Very disappointed in spending $22 return shipping---when the US size 16 shipped to me was more like a US size 22.
Timea
Long Tall Sally
1 day ago
Thank you for your feedback - we're sorry to hear that the sizing was not as expected, as we can understand how frustrating this is. Your comments regarding returns have been noted and passed along to the relevant team.
0
分享
CL
Carolyn Lazenby
经 Feefo 确认
USA
2 days ago
Carolyn Lazenby 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
LTS delivers on time!!!
Been a customer for years!
0
分享
受信赖的顾客
经 Feefo 确认
2 days ago
Love the fact that being a 6feet lady, I am able to access great styles
The ordering is straightforward and the delivery was quicker than I thought. No concerns
0
分享
SG
Sarah Gildersleve
经 Feefo 确认
GBR
2 days ago
Sarah Gildersleve 就 Long Tall Sally 说了什么:
Refund please
Quick and efficient. Maybe the packaging could be better
