I have always used Leisure Guard over the years and always found them to be competitive in the marketplace and getting the required cover is very easy to accomplish. Their website is easy to navigate...
อ่านเพิ่มเติม
Matt
Leisure Guard Travel
3 years ago
Thank you for your feedback.
I am pleased to see that you're happy with the service received and grateful for your continued custom.
If you need to contact us at any point, our details are in your policy documentation.
Regards
Leisure Guard team
วันที่ซื้อ: 02/08/2023
0
แบ่งปัน
MC
Mr John Collins
3 years ago
Mr John Collins พูดเกี่ยวกับ Leisure Guard Travel ว่าอย่างไร:
Really helpful member of team I spoke to would definitely use again and recommend
Matt
Leisure Guard Travel
3 years ago
Thank you for your feedback.
I am pleased to see that you're happy with the service received and i will ensure that your comments are passed back tot he advisor you spoke to.
Regards
Leisure Guard team
วันที่ซื้อ: 01/08/2023
0
แบ่งปัน
MH
Mr James Hughes
3 years ago
Mr James Hughes พูดเกี่ยวกับ Leisure Guard Travel ว่าอย่างไร:
Straightforward application detsils
วันที่ซื้อ: 01/08/2023
0
แบ่งปัน
MP
Miss natalie phillips
3 years ago
Miss natalie phillips พูดเกี่ยวกับ Leisure Guard Travel ว่าอย่างไร:
Company never bothered sending over any documents
Matt
Leisure Guard Travel
3 years ago
Thank you for your feedback.
I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Our records suggest that although the initial email containing your policy documentation was unsuccessful, attempts after that appear to have been received by your email provider.
If this is not the case, please let us know and will arrange for another copy to be forwarded to you.
Aside form the policy documents, can you confirm that the rating provided reflects the overall service received at the point of purchase? If so, please let us know of any other issues or if you were happy with the service, please re-rate the review based on this.
Regards
Leisure Guard team
I took out a policy this week after booking a holiday for later in the year. Paid £16-ish for their best level of cover, but realised the next day I had a GP appointment booked next week in relation...
อ่านเพิ่มเติม
Matt
Leisure Guard Travel
3 years ago
Thank you for your feedback.
I apologise for any inconvenience caused and fully appreciate your frustrations. It may be prudent in this case to provide some additional context and I accept this may not change your decision but might at least explain in more detail.
Generally speaking, all travel insurance providers will have different acceptance criteria, policy terms and conditions and how those terms and conditions are applied in practice. The price of any medical screening to cover a pre-existing condition is essentially calculated relative to the risk posed based on the medical conditions declared.
I note that you mentioned the price doubled, upon completing your medical screening. Here, I can appreciate the frustration but this was neither intentional nor as simplistic as it would seem. The underwriters had deemed the condition declared on your policy a low risk, and with that came a relatively low price, but the details of any pre-existing medical condition are considered their own merits and not in accordance with, or proportional to the price of your travel policy. In other words, this would have been the premium irrespective of the travel insurance policy cost.
This is how it seemed so disproportionate when compared to the premium you paid for the travel policy, but Leisure Guard uses the same medical screening questions widely used within the travel insurance industry. It is true that not all insurers have the same approach, so I do not find it uncommon there are other insurers who consider pre-existing medical conditions differently, but we are unable to change the pre-existing medical screening acceptance criteria for the Leisure Guard travel insurance policies.
Again, I accept this may not change, but hopefully explains the situation.
Regards
Leisure Guard team
ลูกค้าที่ไว้วางใจได้
3 years ago
Matt
Thank you for taking the time to respond, and to provide further details on this matter.
The problem is that your stance is coming from a place of incorrect information. The menopause is not a medical condition, it is a natural stage in 50% of the population's life and to suggest otherwise is not only wrong, it is insulting.
My premium doubled when I discussed the menopause with the person on the phone - it didn't impact on my original premium because it didn't come up as a "medical condition" after going through the questions on the initial quote. There is therefore a disconnect between what your systems are saying and what you say above.
If I didn't have an appointment with my GP this week, I'd not have needed to call you back and therefore my premium would have stood at the original £16-ish price. It seems clear to me that you are using this as a tool to extract additional money from women who are within the relevant age bracket and it simply isn't right.
Your underwriters should perhaps educate themselves as to the difference between the menopause and an actual medical condition, and any woman considering taking insurance with you should go elsewhere until they have.
Matt
Leisure Guard Travel
3 years ago
Thank you for your reply.
I appreciate that my initial response above may not have exactly answered the question, so I will contact you separately via email regarding this matter. Primarily because i will need to go into specifics about your policy and i am unable to do this on the public domain due to data protection regulations.
I can however assure you that there is no intention here to capitalise financially on any customers personal circumstances.
I am investigating this matter internally and will respond to you as soon as i can.
Regards
Leisure Guard team