Gatwickreservations.com(은)는 더 이상 Feefo에서 활동하는 고객이 아닙니다
모두 1,276개의 리뷰 보기
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
7 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
Great Service
Easy to book and good value for money
Natasha Page
Gatwickreservations.com
7 years ago
It's great to hear that you found our booking service great and that our website was easy to use! Here at GatwickReservations.com, we value your feedback and we look forward to any future bookings that you make with us - have a safe trip!
0
공유
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
7 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
Very easy
0
공유
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
7 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
Easy
Very easy site to use hope the service is as good
0
공유
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
I use this website each time I fly
Very easy to book
0
공유
신뢰할 수 있는 고객
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Very good
Okokokokok
0
공유
신뢰할 수 있는 고객
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Fast and efficient
Fast efficient easy to use web site
Natasha Page
Gatwickreservations.com
7 years ago
Thank you for your kind review - here at GatwickReservations.com, we value your feedback and we are thrilled to hear that you found our booking process fast and efficient. We look forward to any future bookings that you make with us and we hope you enjoy your trip!
1
공유
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
Easy to book, great price
Very easy to book
1
공유
신뢰할 수 있는 고객
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Booked same time last year for exactly same weeks with I Love Meet and Greet £96 This year booking cost £152 with same company .When quearied this on phone told this is just the way things are going...
자세히 읽기
0
공유
신뢰할 수 있는 고객
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Customer friendly and easy to book
Your discounted price for regular customers appreciated.
0
공유
TC
Trusted Customer
Feefo 인증됨
8 years ago
Gatwickreservations.com에 대한 Trusted Customer의 의견:
Easy to use
The booking service was fine . I would consider using it again. More clarification On location would help
