Business intelligence on the subject of environmental sustainability - primary activity is events.
Overall
Plenary & Tables
Ratings guide
All Feefo reviews are gathered anonymously from genuine customers. Read more about how our review system works.
Service rating : Interesting debate. It will be good to see the conclusions of the voting and roundtables.Product rating : Input from industry was facinating.
Service rating : Great debate great speakersProduct rating : Not that useful
Service rating : Great panel of speakers for this debate.Product rating : Again, great knowledge around the table, really enjoyed it.
Service rating : Excellent venue, well organised, engaging formatProduct rating : Good debate, liked the questions, well chaired roundtable session - maybe a bit short
Service rating : Good range of speakersProduct rating : I think (table 8) facilitator was a bit out of depth
Good mix of speakers and good chairing.
Service rating : interesting topic - and my view did change as a result of the eventProduct rating : excellent quality of debate on the table - with people who really knew what they were talking about, also people who are very committed to the green agenda.
Service rating : Well constructed session, well chaired and good speakers from different perspectives. Really enjoyed the speakers being able to join remotely as well.Product rating : The speakers were excellent and the process worked very well - the interactivity made it much more engaging than the usual kind of event. Roundtable could have been more focused and engaged more of the participants - I think the Chair needs to be a facilitator more than a participant perhaps.
Service rating : Arguably the most impressive element of the event was the choice of subject matter, which continues to suffer from a lack of evidence-based debate, particularly within the business community. An invaluable opportunity for many industry representatives to hear the ecological, ethical and social justice issues connected to the agricultural application of GMOs.Product rating : The plenary session was excellent - it was challenging for the speakers to address such complex issues within the time-frame but I think that the speakers did so to good effect. The only negative was that more time was necessary to actually debate the points that had been made by the respective speakers and thereby, move this decades old debate forward (for which a follow-up session would be welcome). The roundtable was good, generating a good degree of discussion and desire to listen to alternative perspectives but more in response to the evening's overall question, rather than the specific question set for our roundtable - perhaps because there wasn't enough time for the initial debate. With more time, I am sure that we would have got there! Thank you for an insightful event.
Service rating : One of the best Green Mondays I've been to yet! I like the debate style as it really pushes the panel to make a stand and state the reasons as to why they think one way or another. Very useful, I learned a lot and came out more confused but definitely more interested in the whole GM issue now.Product rating : Everyone at this table brought forward great ideas/solutions either their company has been working on or examples of others. Chair facilitated discussion very well and made sure everyone had a chance to speak.
Service rating : Good spread of speakers. Good technology useProduct rating : The usual interesting mix of people. Table chair seemed to lose the plot on occassion. Could have done mroe to draw in others around the table.
Service rating : Great topic, really liked the format. Great having lots of different speakers in person and remotely, and being able to interact through voting. Shame the technology didn't always work smoothly, but don't give up on it! Love the idea that Google hangout means we can get non-European perspectives to a debate. The Bloomberg location doesn't work for powerpoint presentations - the back half of the room couldn't read the bottom half of any of the slides.Product rating : Chair seemed to think his role was to present his views to everyone else (at one point launching into a 5+ minute monologue). Didn't really discuss the topic in question; half the table did not get an opportunity to speak.
Service rating : Great venue, excellent moderator, good debate, ok round table.Product rating : The debate was good. However, could have ben a lot better. Arguments from both sides were not strong or clear enough or did not address same points.
Service rating : Ok, but not sure the motion was the right one to be askingProduct rating : Not really enough time to get into the real issues and i don't think we had anything that we clearly wanted the corporate community to communicate on
great speakers, great content. dont be concerned about the technical cliches - a top event
Service rating : Great speakers at the event with good opinion submitted by those via the web camsProduct rating : This was the first time attending the event and those participating on the round table had great insight and views on GM, the media and what was felt to be the actual messages consumers needed to hear
Service rating : very good debateProduct rating : well structured
It was my first Green Monday. I thought the quality of the speakers was excellent. A great, lively debate. Shame about some technology hiccups, but overall they didn't detract from the event too much. I also enjoyed the voting element - very engaging.
The debate became more nuanced as the evening progressed.
Some very good speakers which inspired an interesting debate. The venue was 'spectacular' but actually impractical and poorly organsied - you couldn;t see the information on the slides on the central screen and there was no need to show the speaker vlown up on the other two screens as they were right there in front of us unyway.
Service rating : First time at a Green Monday event - found it very interesting and informative.Product rating : While understandable, I found it disappointing that the roundtable discussion never really focused on the question at hand. However, input from several industry representatives was very interesting and informative.
Great debate and use of Google + and voting added to debate
Great debate
Service rating : Liked the debate style but would have been good to have less speakers and more audience debate. Also plenary felt a little too long.Product rating : Interesting and good comments. Although one girl spoke far much than anyone else and her comments weren't all that insightful so the chairs need to manage it and make sure everyone has a change to participate.
Enjoyable, interesting contributions from both panel and participants
